![]() ![]() The researcher compared the outcome trends of two groups: the counties that did not issue stay-at-home orders during the study period and the counties that did. The final sample included data from 3,095 counties from Jan. Guihua Wang, assistant professor of operations management in the Naveen Jindal School of Management “Our results show that the orders increased the percentage of residents staying at home and, therefore, that the orders reduced the number of trips.”ĭr. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey, provided information about residents’ demographics and socioeconomic status. “One nice feature of the data is that the results are aggregated at the county level over different days, which allowed us to compare the mobility of residents in different counties before and after the implementation of stay-at-home orders,” Wang said.Ĭounty-specific data, obtained from the U.S. He also used mobile device data from the University of Maryland COVID-19 Impact Analysis Platform, which reported residents’ mobility based on data from mobile devices, government agencies and health care systems. Wang obtained stay-at-home data from The New York Times, which included detailed information by county, including implementation dates and durations. Wang’s investigation examined whether compliance with the orders differed among counties with varying percentages of vulnerable populations - a widely overlooked aspect, Wang said. Some of the orders, also referred to as shelter-in-place or healthy-at-home advisories, required nonessential businesses to close to the public, which indirectly kept residents at home. A total of 42 states and the District of Columbia implemented similar orders during March and April 2020. On March 19, 2020, California became the first state to implement a stay-at-home order. Those who violated the orders were subject to fines and, in some states, jail time. One of the strictest measures was the stay-at-home orders, which required residents to remain at home except for essential trips, such as grocery shopping or refilling a prescription. In the U.S., local and federal governments considered various measures to contain the spread of coronavirus. “The effectiveness of stay-at-home orders has been the subject of ongoing debate since the outbreak of the pandemic.” Guihua Wang, assistant professor of operations management and the study’s author. ![]() “The COVID-19 pandemic has affected many aspects of our lives, from school closures and job losses to hospitalizations and loss of life,” said Dr. 15 in the INFORMS journal Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, a Naveen Jindal School of Management researcher used anonymized mobile-device data to understand the effect of stay-at-home orders on residents’ mobility. states’ stay-at-home orders in 2020 were effective at increasing the percentage of residents who did, in fact, stay at home during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, although there were differences in compliance due to sociodemographic disparities. Recent research from The University of Texas at Dallas found that U.S. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |